top of page

References:

 

Businessmodelgeneration.com,. (2015). Strategyzer | Business Model Generation. Retrieved 11 December 2015, from http://www.businessmodelgeneration.com/

 

Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

 

Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’and its application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521-532. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X11000603

 

Johnson G & Scholes K (2002). Exploring Corporate Strategy - Text and Cases. 7th Edition. London: Prentice Hall, 
 

Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

 

Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Clark, T. (2010). Business model generation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

 

Porter, M. (1998). Competitive advantage. New York: Free.

 

Ranga, M. & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4 Special Issue), 237-262.

 

Saebi, Tina, Business Model Evolution, Adaptation or Innovation? A Contingency Framework on Business Model Dynamics, Environmental Change and Dynamic Capabilities (March 1, 2014). Business Model Innovation: The Organizational Dimension, Nicolai J Foss & Tina Saebi, eds., Oxford University Press, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2403151

Planning & Professionalism

Business models are constantly evolving, therefore organizations must adapt accordingly to changing environments (Saebi, 2014). While many factors influence evolution of business models, ultimately they must satisfy its main objective - create, capture and deliver value to the user. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The business model canvas (Osterwalder, Pigneur & Clark), is used widely for this and useful for start-ups to produce innovative strategies and applicable to large industries, including Microsoft and Intel. (Businessmodelgeneration.com, 2015) 

 

 

I found the canvas to be crucial in Project Azione. It allowed me to map an existing idea I had, following creation of personas. After, I mapped my target segment and value propositions onto the canvas. From there, I could begin to brainstorm 'customer relationships and channels'. Moreover, this tool allowed me to view the business overall but also, for my multidisciplinary team to have a brief yet significant overview of the model. Now they could challenge my ideas and consequently develop a more defined business plan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While the canvas made a huge impact, it seemed quite simplistic as a tool overall and contained several setbacks. One of which was the lack of appreciation of problems associated with the business idea. I  feel that start-ups/product launches should always consider the major implications in succeeding commercially. Having this present for me and my colleagues to see would allow us to keep due consideration for any reasons for failure, which I thought was vital to the business model creation. 

 

If done differently, I would have certainly applied this to the project.  I believe I didn't fully consider the possible reasons as to why my idea would fail. Having committed a lot of time and effort to the idea, maybe self-pride clouded my judgement. 

 

Another drawback I found was a lack of appreciation for business expansion. Perhaps out of scope, but if this segment could have been attached to the canvas, then it could stimulate further divergent discussion to find a more innovative solution to the existing business model, or even further products. An example would be plans for a new range.  With this in mind, I added this new 'building block' of a business plan to the project. I feel if requesting a loan externally, a potential lender would prefer to know that an entrepeneur has heavily considered the future, especially due to the ever-evolving nature of the marketing environment.

 

 

I even adapted the business model canvas, as a tool to convince clients and external services (interior designers) for Project North Star Housing Group.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While very confident in this module, I need to improve on: manufacturing, production, logistics and revenue streams for next semester. Furthermore, I need to understand project timeframes, where I may prolong divergent thinking and not progress.

Business Model Evolution

 

      Factors to consider;

 

  • Disruptive technologies

 

  • Commoditization

  • Competition

 

  • Socio-cultural change (consumers)

STRENGTHS

 

  • High contribution of business content in projects

 

  • High client praise of business ideas

WEAKNESSES

 

  • Little understanding of 'backstage' processes 

  • Prone to remain divergent in projects

 

Creating value in business with abundant competition is a difficult task. Start-ups and SME's may suffer with less budgets and human resources to allocate for innovative solutions. Clayton Christenson argues that technological value cannot be relied upon in industries, as disruptive innovators are more likely to 'blind-side' competition (Christenson, 1997). Framing a problem using design thinking and a user-centered approach however, we can benefit greatly and look at a different way to solve problems and create value for the user (Dorst, 2011). In my opinion, it is the strategy and values a company holds which determines the desired type of value to be created. Essentially, questions to ask are: which one of our target users' problems are we trying to solve? Which customers' needs are we satisfying? 

 

In Project Azione, I was faced with a difficult task of business expansion. To create new value to the new customer segment, I adopted a blue ocean strategy approach. By observing the 'Four Actions Framework (Kim & Mauborgne, 2005) I focused on two; 'Raise' and 'Create.'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I first established my target segment by analysing their core values. As a very niche market to begin with, I decided to expand it but retain all values held by the company. Here, I could justify placing a price premium on the product.  I then aimed to create desirable value for the new market, including self-expressive and exclusivity value. In short, to focus-differentiate from competition, I wanted the brand to speak for itself, with the emotional, desirable selling point and strong loyalty to customers at the forefront.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Differentiating a bike is difficult, but a unique service coupled with exclusivity I felt was highly sought after in my target market. I used behavioural segmentation after creating personas of commuters, and took business commuters as my target. They already show this behaviour of 'exclusivity' by purchasing high-quality products (think rolex and aston martin). This was fulfilling their emotional needs. The service included fullfilling their career goals, through emerging trends in networking via cycling. A drawback to this competitive strategy is that I would need to convince potential users that the value added is worth the increase in cost. I personally feel taking a blue ocean strategy approach during the ideation phase of the design process is invaluable to promote innovation and create new value to the consumer. Furthermore, this helped me with my method of innovation. During this semester I reverse-engineered success, therefore this technique complemented well with the blue ocean strategy. I was able to focus on a few aspects to improve the business, yet think of something completely new that the industry does not offer. Research of competition showed no UK manufacturers of high quality bikes existed, with such an innovative service attached. Brompton and Pashley (closest rivals) do not offer such. Advantages to sustain this expansion is that Azione would be first to do so and it would be very difficult to copy such a model. The company enforces and hopes to achieve organisational innovation by being disruptive within the industry.

 

However, it is possible to over-fulfil peoples' needs. Socio-cultural factors are crucial when launching a new product or service. An example would be organic foods. It is obvious that only in the past 10-15 years they have increased in sales. This could be due to political interventions with social issues like obesity - therefore it is imperative to keep track of those who can make or influence change. This can essentially change social attitudes and consumers would then see the value of committing to purchase. The issue here for entrepeneurs - to predict and assume correctly. Innovation diffusion should not occur here, as it is an on-going process which improves the careers of my target segment. It is also effectively 'occupational segmentation.'

(Porter, 1998)

(Johnson & Scholes, 2002)

bottom of page